| Follow Ups | Post Followup | Classical Sources Message Board |
| Yes, while RA cringes at the word "Phonetics", RR *IS* phonetics in the purest sense! NT | |
|---|---|
| Author: KC | September 21, 1999 at 14:38:09 |
| in reply to: Re: Review of "Reading Reflex" (FYI)... posted by Angela on September 18, 1999 at 13:03:26 | |
|
> Karen, > > Thanks for that wonderful review! Although Reading Reflex takes a different approach to teaching reading, I think it needs to be emphasized that it is *phonetics*, and does not skimp on reading instruction. I've heard from a couple of people who have only glanced through the program who think that it is not a complete program, but in my opinion only one who has actually used these methods hands-on can fully understand the logic behind it. > > Cindy, > > I hope that RR is helpful to you and your daughter. We used Alphaphonics with our oldest with little problem, but with the next child down I knew he would something more explicit in method. Thankfully, I can tell you that my 6 yr. old son is sounding out every three-letter word he can find in his books, and we are enjoying tangible results from just using these methods over a 5 week period of time. > > Blessings to each of you, Angela |
  | |
| Follow Ups | ||
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Post Followup | ||
| Served by ruboard 1.2.1; Copyright © 1998 by Andrew Maltsev. | ||