| Follow Ups | Post Followup | Classical Sources Message Board |
| Re: Veritas Press vs. Well Trained Mind...(long) | |
|---|---|
| Author: carol in ct | October 19, 1999 at 11:07:59 |
| in reply to: Veritas Press vs. Well Trained Mind... posted by Cindy E on October 19, 1999 at 07:03:49 | |
|
I have read WTM and am familiar with the Veritas Press catalog but have never used any of their programs, particularly the history cards and teachers manuals for history (as far as I know, this is the only "program" materials that they offer; the rest is just recommended sources) and I'm familiar with their free curriculum guide. I have ordered a la carte from their catalog. In thinking about the differences between the two, I think the main difference is that WTM offers homeschoolers a very doable scheme for implementing a classical approach to education. The notebook plan that the authors lay out and the suggestions for manipulating the material are practical and detailed enough that one can actually put them to use without too many questions. For example, check out the history plan throughout the 3 stages and see the progression of analysis and thought that the student is to perform; the same happens with science; which by the way, is different from Veritas Press, which offers no science suggestions until 7th grade or so. Veritas gives no detailed plan of working with the information in the various areas; they mainly recommend curriculum programs. The curriculum guide gives an outline of goals for each academic area at each grade level but, I think, leaves one with more questions than answers as far as how one implements the curriculum at home. In my opinion, Veritas Press, through their catalog, presents classical education from a very specific religious viewpoint, and in the resources that they choose, they leave a distinct impression that the main thrust of classical education is drill (see their description of Saxon math; Shurley Grammar) and chanting (see again Shurley Grammar; Sing, Spell, Read, and Write, etc.). WTM does not specifically incorporate a religious agenda, although one is implied, which, I think, allows for a greater comfort level for those whose religious convictions may not be the same as, for instance, Veritas Press, but who are interested in a classical approach. WTM also incorporates the drill, memory work portion of the grammar stage within the general scheme but doesn't give it undue emphasis and actually does not suggest any resources that involve chants and songs. I think that WTM offers a much more developed plan and resources for the logic and rhetoric stages than does Veritas Press. In fact, I think that in the Veritas Press catalog, the logic stage seems barely present; it seems to merge with the rhetoric--for example, this year Veritas offers omnibus collections for various historical periods that includes history, literature, theology. These readings begin in the 7th grade with a focus on the ancient world and the students read a rather advanced list of ancient works. This seemed odd to me since the last time the student would've been exposed to ancient history in this scheme was second and third grade. What a jump! These are a few thoughts on the differences between the two; I'm sure there are more. Hope this helps. Carol in CT |
  | |
| Follow Ups | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Post Followup | ||
| Served by ruboard 1.2.1; Copyright © 1998 by Andrew Maltsev. | ||